TO THE EDITOR (Continued from p. 97) suggest a surplus, but only that reve nues would grow by $7 billion, which they will. Item. I said that tax reduction was regarded by some as a "residual" use of the prospective $50 billion revenue growth over five years, the part quoted by Mr. Hazlitt. He did not quote the part of my article in which I said that many men believed that tax reduction should have priority for its own sake. The article was neutral on this point, th...